A lot of you reading this have probably seen a bare breast photo on Instagram. I’m talking about the photo that has a woman’s bare breast displayed over a picture of a man in a bathing suit. In my opinion, this photo is one of the most naked photos I have ever seen.
This is one of those things that I think should be called a “naked photo” because it so totally lacks modesty. It doesn’t do it any favors when compared to the photos of naked women that get much more coverage in the mainstream media. I’m not talking about the “naked photo” that has a big splash of color on it. I’m talking about the one that just has a lot of skin.
But like all things, its use is entirely up to the photographer. That said, the nude photography is a bit less common today than it was thirty years ago. Its use has really expanded, and you can find many nude photos of women that are not necessarily of their nude selves. One of the more popular nude photography is of women in their underwear, which I think gets a lot of press.
Nudity is not only about being nude and showing off your figure, but it is also about revealing our true selves and being comfortable around others. It is important to feel comfortable around people who are different from us. Although we all want to show off our body, there is a difference between showing off and revealing. The former is when we are fully nude and show off our body to the world, whereas the latter is when we are fully clothed and reveal our body to the world.
Like the cover of Vogue? That’s a great example of revealing. I think it is probably because of the way the photographer, Annie Leibovitz, used her body for the cover. She had to wear a dress to get the coverage, so she was wearing the skirt and the top to make her look more full. She had to take off her top to show off the breasts.
Here’s the thing about the cover of Vogue that deserves mentioning. She was a very public person and this was her own decision. She’s not making it for anyone. She was making a statement and it was her own decision to do that. When a celebrity is completely naked, you can’t tell why people might be interested in seeing it. I would say it’s mostly because of the body art.
My feeling is, her breasts are sexy. They are just what she wanted the cover to be. If her breasts werent her breasts, they would be hidden underneath a skirt.
People are interested because they can see that shes naked. I think this is why we get so many nude or semi-nude celebs. The amount of attention they get is a lot more of a reflection of what they are, rather than a judgment of their bodies.
Although I personally wouldnt have paid much attention to this if it wasnt for the fact that the cover was very revealing. I would have just assumed shes just some slut who wanted to have sex with a photographer. Although I do agree with you… I think if the cover wasnt so revealing then people wouldnt be interested anyhow.
I would not like to be the person who posted this.